Sandgroper
3284
Enlightenment needed.....
Apr 22, 2015,02:25 AM
Dear connoisseurs,
While admiring time passing on the beautiful dial of the Datograph which, as it happens, has just come back from a long service leave in Germany, I noticed something which left me perplexed. I always thought, well, not really always but for a longer time than my memory dares remember, that the "second hand" on a watch is linked to the minute hand. Therefore, the little crumbs of logic which are left in my small brain tell me that if a watch is fast, or slow, the correlation between the second hand and the minute hand should always be the same. However, this logic of mine does not seem to apply in the case of the Datograph.
I have posted three sketches which I trust, will explain in a much better fashion than my long winded way of expression.
Here we start. The watch shows 10h10 exactly, well, the hour hand is not exactly where it should be but I guess that you get the drift.
Now, 24 hours have passed, the watch however is functioning slowly, for this example I say 30 seconds slow every 24 hours. One can easily see the second hand at 6 and therefore the minute hand is located exactly between the 9 and 10 minute marker. Nice, logical, cool!
Here comes what I believe is an anomaly. 24 hours have gone by now, the second hand is 30 seconds slow, all normal, cool and logical. However, please note that the minute hand is not located between two minute-marker, it is now slower. This means that the minute hand is not correlated to the second hand. The minute hand and the second hand are not linked? How could that be?
I am perplexed and puzzled. If some connoisseur within the fraternity could enlighten me, I would be very delighted
Thank you for reading.
Cheers
Francois